|
Who says Democracy is dead?
As we saw with the last presidential election, democracy is
dying. Oh sure, those who voted for Bush don't think that.
But, let me just say, I believe our democracy is dying. The idea
of democracy won't die. In the history of the world democracies
have risen and fallen. There is a steady, but sure, decline to
all of them. It's because vigilance is the cost of
democracy. Becoming lazy about one's rights is a surefire formula
for the erosion of democratic rights.
As we saw in the last two presidential elections, vote counts are
fudged to favor one candidate over another. In the history of
this country there have never been two more blatant examples of one
candidate stealing an election the way George Bush did in 2000, and
2004. But, was he run out of office? Was he
impeached? Was he scared to try it a second time in the 2004
election? No. If anything the voting controversy was even
more blatant in the 2004 election than in the 2000 election. Yet,
the millions that voted for Kerry didn't make a sound. They
grimaced, thought about moving to Canada, but they didn't fight.
The one thing that we should have done is fight for our voice.
Like how those brave patriots fought for their rights in the Ukraine
this year. They forced not just a recount, but a new
election. But not us. We're used to this democracy
thing. We don't even care to defend it anymore. Oh sure,
fly a plane into a building and we're off to fire bullets at anyone
that moves. But, that's not the way one keeps democracy alive.
Democracy is only sustainable if the people are moved into
action. The greatest example is the vote. It is the lowest
common denominator in democracy. One person, one vote, that's the
idea. Yet, today corporations, who don't vote, carry more
influence than an individual's vote. Money carries more clout
than a vote. In short, votes don't count in this country.
And when votes don't count, then a democracy is seeing it's dying
days. Because the next step is to stop pretending that a person's
vote counts altogether... a dictatorship.
|
Truth by Repetition
The economy is doing great. Right? Taxes need to be lower to spur the
economy. Right? I mean, I've heard these things over and
over again that I've come to believe them. But then the other day
I was thinking, do I believe these things because they are true, or
because I've heard them so many times?
You know, it's really hard to say at this point. I think that
they are true, but that probably comes from hearing them so many
times. Am I hearing them over and over again because they are
true, or just because they are being repeated? It's hard to tell
at this point. When you become so saturated with something you
tend to believe it. Even if it's something you would never
believe if you heard it once. I hear it's called conditioning,
repeation makes things true. Yeah, probably.
All I can tell you is that I keep hearing that taxes are too high, and
should be lowered. I don't really know what happens when taxes
are lowered. Sure, I get to see a few more dollars in my
pocket. But, is that really a saving? I'm beginning to
wonder. If I pay less in income taxes, but the government still
spends as much as it did before the tax cuts, who is to say that it's
really a savings? Who is going to pay that debt the government
incurred? I guess the answer is not me. Since I'll probably
be long gone by the time someone comes around to collect on that
debt. At least I hope I'm long gone. I sure hope that I'm
not in the middle of my Social Security years when the bill comes, and
my benefits are cut. That would not make me happy at all.
Maybe it's time I start to question all these things that are being
repeated. They might be repeated so much so I'll just take them
as fact, and so I won't question them. Could be, could be.
|
As good as Lucy, but not really
You know the show "I Love Lucy?" The one with Lucile Ball and her
husband Ricky Ricardo, er, I mean Desi Arnez? I like that
show. I mean, it's not as funny as say, the Honeymooners.
Now that was a super show. I mention I Love Lucy because there
was this tribute to the show on TV the other night. It had the
usual bunch of clips from the show, like the famous chocolate factory
sketch. Oh, and the stomping grapes deal where Lucy gets into a
big fight with a grape stomper. Yeah, that was pretty funny, when
I first saw it. Now it's something I chuckle at, but I certainly
don't fall on the floor laughing these days.
These days I notice that on Entertainment Tonight, someone always comes
out and says this actress is the next Lucy, or such and such is the new
Lucy. Funny, I missed the part where I was supposed to care that
there was a newly anointed Lucy. I think I also missed when these
supposed successors to Lucy were actually as funny as Lucile
Ball. Now I'm not a huge fan of Lucy, but I'm pretty sick and
tired of hearing that such and such flash in the pan actress is
suddenly the next Lucy. Yeah, because staring in some dumb movie
about a man cheating on his wife is REAL funny. That
automatically nominates any actress into the Lucy stardom realm, I
guess.
Oh, and being on a so-so, but mostly boring, show automatically
nominates any actress into the Lucy realm too. How many truly
funny women are out there working their butts off to make people laugh,
only to have some not so funny actress be anointed "The Next
Lucy?" I'm just sick of it. That's all, and baba lou to you
all.
|
What Would Jesus Do?
|
|