|
The Church of Money
I'm not a very religious guy, at least when it comes to the traditional
religions of the world. Being a capitalist I worship the only
thing really worth worshipping, MONEY. Because, in these times of
racial strife, terrorism, class struggles, and such, it's important to
be faithful to the one thing that really makes us different from one
another. That being money, and how much you have. Because
money isn't the root of all evil, it's the root of all that's good.
Money makes people work harder. It makes them want things that
they can't afford right now. But, with a little hard work, you
can get money to buy the things that make you happy. It's that
simple. So why not make money the one and only deity? I
don't see why that shouldn't be. We already have "In God We
Trust" on our money. How big of a stretch would it be to say that
the God we trust is the money that proclaims that great
statement? For me, and many others, this deification of our
monetary system would be cutting out an element that most of us don't
even believe in. We could throw away the bible, the tora, the
koran, and all that jazz. They aren't needed anyways. No
one really follows them anyway. Business, and the laws that
govern business, should be the supreme law of the religion of money.
Because, the business model is better at this morals thing than
anything the religions of the world have made up. In buisness
it's everyone for themselves. That's more like it. In
buisness it's market forces that dictate actions. And, the good
thing about that is that if you have enough money you can dictate
market forces to lean to your way of thinking. Now isn't that a
great idea? Why should we have to suffer with all these ideals
that don't work in practice? Has the Golden Rule ever helped
anyone succeed? No, of course not. All the Golden Rule has
even done is create a bunch of simpletons that are altruistic, and work
for the betterment of all mankind. Who the hell wants that?
Not me. I only want to make my bank account better, and bigger.
In closing, I'd like to extend an invitation to everyone out there who
is tired of following those silly religions that talk about loving your
neighbor, and looking out for your fellow man. All that is being
some stupid pollyanna. Prey to the real God, the one you have in
your wallet. I'm sure you'll be much happier.
|
Entertain Me
The best kind of news comes in little bite sized packages called sound
bites, ya know. I don't need to know every detail of what's going
on in the world. How does something, say, going on in Iraq affect
me and my day to day life? I ask you, how does anything China
does affect my life? Will an insightful report on things the
President is doing going to affect the price of the hamburger I eat
every day? I seriously doubt it.
I don't read the paper much, I pretty much get all my news from
TV. Entertainment Tonight, or Extra Extra, or something like
that, tell me all I need to know. And really, what do I care if
the a dividend tax goes up? I want to know if J.Lo and Ben are
going to get married. That affects me much more than some stupid
tax. It's all politics anyway. Nothing that appears on the
newspaper affects me at all. Well, except what's in the
entertainment page. That's what I really want to know
about. I want to know about the movie I'm going to see this
weekend. I'm going to see that great new movie that every critic
says is a bomb. I don't listen to them. I don't even know
why I read those article. They never get anything wrong. I
mean, Gigli was a GREAT movie. It was way romantic, and really
hit me somewhere. I don't like movies like Schindler's List, and
such. Those movies are way too serious. Besides, something
like that would never happen in real life. How could it?
So I hear that that new starlet is getting involved with an older
man. I can't imagine those two together, but there they were on
the front page of the Post. You know how they play those things
off, by saying that they're doing a movie together and stuff.
Come on, you know there's constant hooking up on movie sets. It's
part of what they do. I read that that woman from the movie
everyone hated had some sort of botox thing injected into her face to
make her look younger. I'll tell you something, she didn't get it
done before the movie was shot. She looked so old. I
remember her as the real hot chick in that movie about the bank
heist. Remember how good she looked in that? I read that
after seeing her, the director asked the writer to put her character in
more scenes. Even if it didn't make sense for her character to be
there. It didn't matter, he wanted her in every scene. And
you know what? It worked. The movie was so great because
she was constantly running around making strange comments.
Although, now that I think about it, I wonder if the writer didn't
write her those stupid lines in order to make her look more
stupid. I wonder.
|
Not on the Field
I, for one, am glad that some computer picks who is going to be the
college football champion. It takes the element of surprise out
of the whole college football thing. I don't like
surprises. I rather have the reliability of a computer to figure
out what team is the best team in the college football ranks.
Computers, unlike people, are flawless. They don't make mistakes,
and when they say that a team is the best team in the nation, you
better believe it. They don't have a bias towards any
teams. They just look at the numbers, and use their advanced
formulas, to determine which teams will meet for the 'championship'
game. It's a brilliant system, and a brilliant idea.
This whole thing about playoffs is silly. In a playoff scenario
anything can happen. The number one ranked team isn't always the
one that wins in a playoff scenario. It's always the better team,
whatever that means. Besides, what if the number one team has an
off night? Then what? They're eliminated from the playoffs,
and we're left with what's left. Teams that aren't ranked number
one. And what does that get you?
To me a championship team that's determined by playoffs really isn't
the best team. Computers, and formulas, should determine which
team really is the best, and the champion. Because, how many
times has your favorite team ended the regular season with the best
record, only to lose in the first or second round of the
playoffs? I know it's happened to me a few times. Like in
pro basketball. The teams with the best records in the regular
season has won the title only 2 times in the last six years. So I
ask you, which team is the real NBA champion? The team that won
the most games, or the one that won the championship series? See,
if it was up to a computer it would be very likely that the teams that
won those four championships wouldn't have even been in the finals, let
alone win them.
All I'm saying is that playoffs are unreliable. Computers are the
way to go, which is why I like the college football way of picking a
national champion. Who needs the drama of the playoffs?
That sort of drama is just another name for uncertainty.
|